This study examined three methods for retrospectively identifying infection in emergency department (ED) patients: modified objective definitions of infection (MODI) from the CDC/NHSN, physician adjudication determination of infection, and ED treating physician behavior.
This study used a subset of data from a prospective sepsis trial. We used Fleiss’s Kappa to compare agreement between two physicians retrospectively adjudicating infection based on the patient’s medical record, modified infection definition from the CDC/NHSN, and ED treating physician behavior.
Overall, there was similar agreement between physician adjudication of infection and MODI criteria (Kappa=0.59) compared to having two physicians independently identify infection through retrospective chart review (Kappa=0.58). ED treating physician behavior was a poorer proxy for infection when compared to the MODI criteria (0.41) and physician adjudication (Kappa = 0.50).
Retrospective identification of infection poses a significant challenge in sepsis clinical trials. Using modified definitions of infection provides a standardized, less time consuming, and equally effective means of identifying infection compared to having multiple physicians adjudicate a patient’s chart.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Retrospective Identification of Infection in the Emergency Department: A Significant Challenge in Sepsis Clinical Trials.
![Retrospective Identification of Infection in the Emergency Department: A Significant Challenge in Sepsis Clinical Trials.](https://cdn.physiciansweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Hand-touching-on-protection-treatment-prevention-and-patronage-health-icon-with-internal-organs-heart-brain-kindneys-liver-lungs-stomach.-st-e1723147186703-1280x640.jpg)
Create Post
Twitter/X Preview
Logout